This entry was posted on Thursday, October 15th, 2009 and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Jul 28, 2010 |
Green Party MP Gareth Hughes is currently promoting his new member’s bill that will help …
Jul 26, 2010 |
‘The language is the core of our Maori culture and mana. Ko te reo te …
Jul 26, 2010 |
Every year since 1975 New Zealand has marked Maori Language Week. This is a time …
Jul 25, 2010 |
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of …
Jul 24, 2010 |
Earth Policy Institute
In 2009, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China—the world’s leading emitter—grew by nearly …
Submit a comment
Comments
aaleex
October 18th, 2009 at 11:29 am
Matthew 21 – 13
And He said to them, “It is written, ‘MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER’; but you are making it a ROBBERS’ DEN.”
aaleex
October 28th, 2009 at 10:51 am
Expression of concern.
We are appalled by the huge cover-up that has taken place, covered up its dirty secrets, swept under the carpet while projecting an image of moral respectability.
From the church leadership and the church it self there was never any expression of concern
Roy
March 19th, 2010 at 10:23 am
I have read this link to Auckland Church land Fraud. twice recently. How on earth can a so called respected Lawyer/Judge get away with this? Surely the Church needs to stand up and take some responsibility. It’s not just the Paedophiles in the Churchs that seem to get away with it! A sad state of affairs.
spiritedcrone
March 22nd, 2010 at 5:36 am
What does the church have to say about it?
aaleex
March 29th, 2010 at 5:42 am
LINK
Anglican Church land Fraud
Bottom of page.
Church response
Tim
May 14th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
Whatever the reality of the claims may be, the letters from the Auckland Diocese’s legal representative clearly invite some evidence in order to engage with the claims. That’s not been forthcoming. Until that is made available, what would you have the Church do?
aaleex
May 15th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Read the evidence before you – this evidence was made available to Murray Ward.
I would have the church look into this as I wanted them to.
Tim
May 18th, 2010 at 8:05 am
But the last letter from Ward clearly indicates the legal opinion that that material – by itself – doesn’t indicate misbehaviour on the part of the church. By lawyers’ standards, it seems to be inviting more information and not closing down avenues of redress.